ABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about the duration of humoral antibody levels after two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations in patients with immunosuppression. During this ongoing global epidemic, it is of essential interest to gather information about the time of protection after initial immunization in the vulnerable patients receiving either conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) or biological/targeted drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Objectives: In this study we compared the antibody level development after vaccination and after six months in patients with infammatory arthritis, infammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls. Furthermore, we assessed factors affecting the quality and quantity of the humoral response. Methods: We enrolled 85 healthy controls (HC), 75 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis and 41 patients suffering from IBD. Patients treated with B-cell depleting therapies were excluded from this study. Binding antibody units were measured after vaccination and 6 or more months. Neutralizing antibodies were measured after 6 months. Multivariate regression analyses analyzing factors associated with low titers after 6 months was performed. Results: We found that patients with infammatory arthritis or IBD showed reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers compared to HC. When we stratifed for therapies, we found that patients receiving conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic dugs (csDMARDs) had comparable anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers to HC. In contrast, patients receiving biological or targeted synthetic (b/tsDMARDs) showed reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 Igs as well as neutralizing antibody titers compared with healthy controls (HC) or patients receiving conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. We further show that anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers declined more rapidly in patients receiving b/tsDMARDs compared to HC, leading to a 50 percent reduction in vaccination-associated protection time in patients receiving b/tsD-MARDs when compared to those receiving csDMARDs or even HC. In multi-variate regression analyses, we found that in addition to the type of treatment, also age as well as corticosteroid use were associated with reduced anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers. Conclusion: Patients under ongoing b/tsDMARDs therapy exposed an accelerated waning of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titers and therefore decreased immunity and protection against severe Covid-19 infections over time. These results may lead to more personalized approaches for further vaccination strategies in this group of immunosuppressed patients.
ABSTRACT
Background Immunosuppressive and biological medications are a mainstay in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), rheumatic diseases, and psoriasis. However, the COVID-19 pandemic caused concerns over the safety of these drugs pertaining to risk and severity of infection with SARS-CoV2. Moreover, pandemic mitigation strategies may negatively impacted treatment start with immunosuppressive and biological treatment fostering worse long-term disease outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on new starts of immunosuppressive and biological treatment in Austria. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis with a 4-year observation period from 2017 to 2020 on real-world data on prescriptions for immune-mediated diseases of the Austrian health insurance funds covering 98% of the Austrian population. Data from all patients with incident biologic or conventional immunosuppressive treatment (Table 1) were included. Incidence of biologic (including small molecules) and immunosuppressive therapy was defined as all first prescriptions of one of the listed substances from 2017. The incidence rate for biologic and immunosuppressive treatments was recorded monthly in 2020 and compared with the three previous years (2017 – 2019). Results During the first lockdown in Austria in spring 2020 (week 12 – week 20), there was a significant decrease in the overall starts of biologic (including small molecules) and immunosuppressive treatments (both p<0.0001), especially in April (Figure 1 and 2). After that lockdown, new starts of immunosuppressive and biological treatments rapidly re-achieved pre-lockdown levels despite higher infection rates with SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent lockdown periods (Figure 3). Independent from the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a continuous increase of biological medication (bDMARDs) and small molecules (p<0.0001) and a decrease of conventional immunosuppressive medications (cDMARDS) (p<0.0120) during all observed years (Figure 1 and 2) Conclusion In patients with immune-mediated diseases in Austria the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant decrease of newly started immunosuppressive and biological treatments only during the first lock-down. Over the last four years, we can observe a continuous increase of small molecules and biological medication as well as a continuous decrease of conventional immunosuppressive medication.